There is no printed copy available to order.
Abstract:
Integrating health care services is thought
to result in both cost savings and better
outcomes through improving efficiency,
quality, uptake and effectiveness of
services. Integration is one of the seven
core principles guiding the United States
Global Initiative.
Although there is evidence on some aspects of
the impacts of integration, such as increases
in coverage rates for various interventions,
there is little evidence regarding actual
outcome variables. In this paper we utilize
the empirical evidence available on the
impact of integration on coverage rates and
costs to model the impact of integrating
services to prevent mother-to-child
transmission with antenatal clinic sites on
infant HIV infections averted, and also the
impact of integrating family planning
services into HIV care facilities. We
calculate incremental cost-effectiveness
ratios for a number of different scenarios
using the LiST model for Malawi, Mozambique
and Uganda.
We find that all of the integration
strategies are cost-effective, with all of
the scenarios except one being highly cost-
effective. In fact, a majority of the
scenarios examined actually report cost
savings, particularly when the interactive
and dynamic effects that are modeled across
the different modules are included; for
example, increasing family planning results
in lower costs for providing health care to
children, including immunization, because
there are fewer children born.
We conclude that, although few empirical
results exist regarding the incremental cost-
effectiveness ratios associated with
integrating HIV and MNCH services, the
modeled evidence confirms that there are,
indeed, significant benefits to integration.