Back to browse results
Arsenic and fasting blood glucose in the context of other drinking water chemicals: a cross-sectional study in Bangladesh
Authors: Shadassa Ourshalimian, Abu Mohd Naser, Mahbubur Rahman, Solaiman Doza, Jennifer Stowell, K.M. Venkat Narayan, Mohammad Shamsudduha, and Matthew O. Gribble
Source: Environmental Research, 172: 249-257; DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.049
Topic(s): Adult health
Diabetes
Water supply
Water treatment
Country: Asia
  Bangladesh
Published: MAY 2019
Abstract: Goal The goal of this study was to evaluate the association between groundwater arsenic and fasting blood glucose in the context of other groundwater chemicals, in Bangladesh. Methods Fasting blood glucose, gender, body mass index, sociodemographic variables, and diabetes medication use were measured among adults =?35 years of age (n?=?6587) participating in the Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) 2011. Groundwater chemicals in 3534 well water samples were measured in the British Geological Survey (BGS) and Department of Public Health Engineering (DPHE) 1998–99 survey. We assigned the nearest BGS-DPHE well's chemical exposure to each BDHS participant. We used survey-estimation linear regression methods to model natural log-transformed fasting blood glucose, among those using groundwater as their primary drinking-water source, as a function of groundwater arsenic. We considered possible interactions between categorical arsenic exposure and each of 14 other groundwater chemicals dichotomized at their medians. The chemicals considered as possible effect modifiers included: aluminum, barium, calcium, iron, potassium, lithium, magnesium, manganese, sodium, phosphorous, silicon, sulfate, strontium, and zinc. Results Compared to persons exposed to groundwater arsenic =?10?µg/L, the adjusted geometric mean ratio (GMR) of fasting blood glucose was 1.01 (95% confidence interval: 0.98, 1.04) for individuals exposed to groundwater arsenic concentrations >?10?µg/L and =?50?µg/L, and was 1.01 (0.97, 1.03) for those with >?50?µg/L arsenic. There were no Bonferroni-significant interactions with other chemicals, after accounting for the large number of chemicals tested as modifiers. Conclusions In our analysis of groundwater chemistry data from 1998/99 and fasting blood glucose outcomes measured in nearby populations approximately a decade later, there was no overall association of fasting blood glucose with nearby historical groundwater arsenic. This null association was not significantly modified by the historical levels of other groundwater chemicals. These null results are inconclusive regarding shorter-term potential toxicity of arsenic for glucose regulation, if there are differences between the historical concentrations measured in nearby groundwater and the actual drinking water chemical exposures in the population during the etiologically relevant period for more acute phenotypes like fasting blood glucose. Drinking water supply-relevant, longitudinal exposure assessment with less measurement error is needed to more precisely evaluate the joint impacts of drinking water chemicals and establish if there is a sensitive time window for glycemic outcomes.